Skip to content

AloLab · Research

Building the world's best and safestAI agents.

AloLab researches how to make AI agents reliable, safe and auditable, for the highest-stakes operations in enterprise.

85% accurate.0% usable.

Without a harness, every model we tested, open and proprietary, achieved strong task accuracy but produced zero parsable output.

ModelTask accuracyOutput accuracy
Llama 3.1-8B76.9%0%
Gemma 2-9B80.4%0%
Qwen 2.5-7B85.1%0%
GPT-4o84.3%0%

GSM8K benchmark, naive prompting — no formatting instruction. Task accuracy measures mathematical correctness; output accuracy measures correctness + valid structured output.

Reliability at scale,without fine-tuning.

  • 0 → 84–95%output accuracy after AloLab optimization, from 0% baseline under naive prompting
  • 8.2×latency overhead of constrained decoding eliminated, AloLab runs at near-zero cost
  • 29/30paired McNemar comparisons significant at p < 0.05 across all models and datasets

Black-box API access only. No weights, no gradients, no fine-tuning. The same framework works across open-weight and proprietary models.

Iterative AI optimizationvia execution traces.

  1. Solve

    Query the target model via API on production-derived tasks. Black-box only — no weights, no gradients.

  2. Evaluate

    Compute per-sample metrics reproducibly: JSON validity, task correctness, execution trace.

  3. Analyze

    Identify recurring failure and success patterns across the full execution trace. Categorize by failure taxonomy.

  4. Optimize

    Rewrite the system prompt to address failures without disrupting what already works. Repeat for 4 epochs.

Best validation checkpoint selected for deployment. Optimization cost paid once — inference uses only the resulting prompt.

Most evals measurethe answer.

We measure the work: every tool call, reasoning step, retry loop and failure mode, logged and classified.

  • Standard evals

    Binary pass/fail on final output. Failure modes invisible.

  • Trajectory evals

    Step-level traces. Failure taxonomy: loops, context collapse, hallucinated tool use, reasoning-output decoupling.

Models improve. Harnesses compound.

A frontier model that produces the right answer in the wrong format is as unusable as one that gets it wrong. The harness is what closes the gap.

  1. 01Work alignment

    Reliability first. Humans freed from process.

  2. 02Human centricity

    Technology that serves people, not the other way around.

  3. 03Harness > model

    The orchestration layer is the product. The model is a commodity.

  4. 04Open science, private deployment

    Publish the method. Protect the data.

Asked, answered.

What is trajectory intelligence in AI agents?

Trajectory intelligence evaluates every step an AI agent takes — tool calls, reasoning, retries, failures — not just the final output. AloLab’s research shows this step-level analysis reveals failure modes invisible to standard pass/fail evaluations.

Why do AI agents fail in production despite passing benchmarks?

Standard benchmarks measure task accuracy alone. AloLab research demonstrates that models can achieve 85% task accuracy while producing 0% usable output — the structured-output reliability gap makes benchmark scores misleading for production deployment.

How does AloLab improve AI agent reliability?

AloLab is an iterative system-prompt optimizer requiring only black-box API access. It analyzes agent execution traces, identifies recurring failure patterns, and rewrites the orchestration harness — reaching 84–95% output accuracy at near-zero latency overhead.

Is AloLab open source?

Yes. The AloLab framework and benchmarks are open-source at github.com/alomana-lab/alolab. The peer-reviewed paper is available at arXiv 2605.02363.

Partner with the lab.

Run AloLab on your own models and production traces. Benchmark agents against a deployed baseline. Close the reliability gap before it reaches your customers.