Compare

Rendered artifacts → deployed internal appsAlomana vs Claude Artifacts

Claude Artifacts is a fast way to prototype an interface beside a chat. Alomana is where that idea becomes software: a full-stack internal app with a live backend, wired to your company data, run by operators — in a workspace you control.

Free to start — no credit card. ISO 27001 · GDPR.

The short version

What is Alomana, and what is Claude Artifacts?

Alomana

An agentic harness for the enterprise: describe the work and Alomana builds an operator (an agent that runs the process end-to-end) plus persistent internal apps on your live data — every run logged and auditable, in a workspace you control.

Claude Artifacts

A feature of Anthropic's Claude: the assistant renders code, documents, and interactive components in a panel beside the chat — a fast way to create and share prototypes.

An artifact is a rendered prototype that lives beside a chat; an Alomana app is running software — live backend, real data connections, auditable runs — that a team keeps using.

See it in action

From a sentence to an AI deployed operator

Describe the work in plain language. Alomana builds, validates, and deploys a production operator that runs on your live data, not a prototype that stops on your machine.

Side by side

How does Alomana compare to Claude Artifacts?

CapabilityAlomanaClaude Artifacts
Primary outputDeployed full-stack apps (React frontend + live FastAPI backend)Rendered components and documents beside the chat
Backend & dataLive backend wired to your systems through 20+ connectorsRuns client-side in the chat; no persistent company backend
PersistenceApps live in a shared workspace — reusable, shareable, permanentArtifacts live with the conversation and can be shared or remixed
Agents that executeOperators run processes end-to-end and write & run real code in an isolated sandboxThe assistant generates the artifact; execution stays in the chat context
Enterprise governanceDedicated single-tenant instance; every run logged and auditable; ISO 27001, GDPRGoverned by your Claude plan and its workspace controls
ModelsModel-agnostic — OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic; open-source enabled on requestAnthropic's Claude models

Which is right for you

When to choose Alomana vs Claude Artifacts

Choose Alomana if…

You want the prototype to become a real internal tool — on live company data, with governance an enterprise can sign off.

Choose Claude Artifacts if…

You want to sketch an interface or document fast, inside a conversation with Claude.

Questions, answered

Alomana vs Claude Artifacts, FAQ

Is Alomana a Claude Artifacts alternative for business?

For shipping internal tools, yes. Artifacts are excellent for prototyping beside a chat; Alomana builds the production version — a full-stack app with a live backend, wired to company data through 20+ connectors, deployed in a dedicated single-tenant workspace.

What can a real app do that an artifact can't?

Run with a live backend on current company data. An artifact renders in the chat and doesn't connect to your systems; an Alomana app queries your databases and tools through connectors, is run by operators, stays available to the whole team, and every run is logged and auditable.

Can we turn an idea we prototyped in a chat into an Alomana app?

Yes — describe it. Alomana generates, validates, and deploys the app into your workspace: React frontend, live FastAPI backend, connected to your data. The prototype-to-production step is the product.

Is our data isolated, and is it used for training?

Production runs in a dedicated single-tenant instance with EU hosting available — your data never touches shared infrastructure and is never used to train AI models. Every agent run is logged and auditable: input, output, tools, and user.

No setup. No code. No pilot purgatory.

Ship the operator,
not the prototype.

Start free in minutes, or see Alomana on your own data in a 30-minute walkthrough with your workflows and documents.

ISO 27001GDPRSingle-tenant